Start to Finish Relationship In Project Management: Meaning & Examples

start to finish relationship

Start to Finish Relationship in Project Management

start to finish

In this article, I have defined and explained Start To Finish Logical Relationship with the help of Project Network Diagrams, Gantt Charts & Examples. Start to Finish (SF) is one of the four relationships described in Precedence Diagramming Method (PDM).

The other three are:

  1. Finish to Start (FS)
  2. Start to Start (SS)
  3. Finish to Finish (FF)

These are used to represent and analyze project schedule. This concept originated with PDM. However, by using modern scheduling tools like MS Project and Primavera, you can pictorially represent them on Gantt Charts as well. These relationships are sometimes referred to as project dependencies but former is a better term.

Definition of Start to Finish Relationship

Start To Finish is a Logical Relationship in which a Successor Activity cannot finish until a Predecessor Activity has started.


In simple words we can say that, the Finish of a Successor Activity is Dependent on Start of the Predecessor Activity.

The most common and natural relationship is Finish to Start (FS). Some authors (incorrectly) claim that FS and SF are essentially same. However, it is not true. Even though it is mathematically possible to transform SF to FS to achieve the same result, one should not modify and tamper with natural logic. In real world, SF is very rarely used. You can read FS vs. SF for more details.

You can also look at Max Wideman’s Glossary for a complete set of definitions on PDM.

Project Network Diagram Representation

Let us consider two activities A and B.

  • Duration of A – 3 days
  • Duration of B – 1 day
  • B has a SF relationship with A
  • B’s Finish is dependent on A’s Start – B can Finish (F) as soon as A Starts (S).

start to finish

In the above example, the Project Team would need a total of 4 days to complete these activities.

Gantt Chart Representation

start to finish

Mathematical Representation And Formulas

If you are using 0 method

B(F) = A(S)

Or, if you are using 1 method

B(F) = A(S) – 1

Start To Finish Examples

  • A – Duty of Evening Guard (E), B – Duty of Morning Guard (M). M cannot Finish her/his duty till E Starts. M cannot abandon the post.
  • A – Start using New Software System (N), B – Phase out Old Software System (O). It is assumed that N & O cannot be used in parallel.

Over To You

SF is not a very difficult concept to understand. But sometimes it is confused with FS. After reading this article, do you still have a question(s)?

Do you think this is useful in real projects? Have you ever used it in you project(s)?

Please leave a comment.

Related Articles

0 and 1 Method To Solve Network Diagrams
What are Project Dependencies
4 Types of Project Dependencies
Lead vs Lag
FAQs on Lead and Lag

PMP Exam Formulas

I have also compiled a PMP Formulas Cheat Sheet. It contains 45 formulas and 57 abbrviations. It will help you in your exam prep. You can freely download the PMP Formulas Sheet for your studies. It is the best and most comprehensive cheat sheet based on the PMBOK Guide 6th edition.

If you are looking beyond a cheat sheet, then I would suggest you to buy detailed PMP Exam Formula Study Guide by Cornelius Fichtner. It contains detailed explanations of all the formulas along with examples and 105 practice questions.

Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links - it means that, if you buy from any of these links, then I will receive a small commission that would help me in maintaining this blog for free. However, for you, there is no extra cost. I recommend only those products that I believe will definitely help the certification aspirants.

Praveen Malik, PMP

​Praveen Malik ​is a certified Project Management Professional (PMP®) with a rich 23+ years of experience. He is a leading Project Management Instructor, Coach and ​Advisor. He ​has successfully trained thousands of aspirants for the PM certification exams.

Click Here to Leave a Comment Below

Leave a Reply: