## PERT, CPM and Standard Deviation are Related Concepts!

### What is Critical Path Method (CPM)?

Critical Path is the **Longest Path** in the Project Network. Critical Path represents the **Shortest Possible Duration** of the project. Critical Path can be determined by applying **Critical Path Method (CPM)** on the Project Network.

How can Critical Path be “Longest” and “Shortest” at the same time? Refer to the 17 Frequently asked Questions on the Critical Path Method to get answer to this question and some other frequently asked questions”.

### What is Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT)?

PERT is a **Three-Point Estimation** technique. This technique is based on **Beta Distribution** and uses 3 different duration estimates to arrive at a final estimate. Since, a single-point estimation is more risk-prone, PERT uses 3 different estimates to arrive at a final estimate. PERT reduces the Risks and improves the accuracy of estimation. You can refer to 3-point estimation is different from PERT… to understand nuances of Three Point Estimation and PERT.

### What is Standard Deviation?

In Statistics and Probability Theory, **Standard Deviation (SD)** measures the amount of **Variation from Average** **or Mean**. In current context Average or Mean is represented by Weighted Average calculated using PERT formula.

A low value of SD indicates that data points are very close to the Mean. On the other hand a high value of SD indicates that data points are spread out over a large range.

You can refer to What is Significance of Standard Deviation in PERT formula? to understand how SD can be used to determine the probability of finishing a task within a specified time range.

PERT and CPM are singular concepts. In my previous articles on PERT & CPM were treated as singular concepts. However, PERT & CPM can be combined together to improve Project Schedule Management. Let us understand the combination of PERT & CPM by looking at an example.

### PERT CPM Example

Let us consider a Project Network having 3 activities on the Critical Path – Alpha, Bravo and Charlie. Refer to Figure 1 to understand the relationship between the 3 activities.

Refer to Figure 2 to check data values corresponding to the 3 activities shown in figure 1. The Mean in Figure 2 (for each activity) is calculated by using the PERT formula.

E_PERT=(O+P+4×M)/6

The Standard Deviation (SD) or σ in Figure 2 (for each activity) is calculated by using the following formula.

The Variance in Figure 2 (for each activity) is calculated by using the following formula

You would notice that (in Figure 2) there are 4 different Duration of Critical Path. The Optimistic, Pessimistic, Most Likely and Mean Duration of the Critical Path are calculated by adding their respective individual values.

#### Now which of these 4 is the real Critical Path?

There could be only one Longest Duration in a Project. CPM (Critical Path Method) is about Longest Path(s).

Refer to the following figures – Figure 3 to Figure 5. These figures depict Optimistic, Pessimistic and Most Likely Critical Paths. All the figures are drawn using Time Scaled Schedule Network Diagram.

#### Which of these 3 Paths should be managed by the PM?

If we are using PERT then none of the above Schedules describe the real Critical Path. PERT calculations were done to manage Risks. However, none of the above Schedules manages Risk appreciably. Let us draw a 4th figure using Mean of Estimated Values. Refer to Figure 6 – it depicts the real Critical Path.

#### So what is the use of Standard Deviation (σ)?

Let us use the Variances along with the Mean Values in order to manage Risks better.

We have already calculated σ for all 3 activities – Alpha, Bravo & Charlie. We now have to calculate Critical Path σ. Critical Path σ cannot be calculated by simply adding individual σ. As per the Statistics, individual σ cannot be added together. In order to determine Critical Path σ, we have to first find Variance of the Critical Path.

Var (Critical Path) = Var(Alpha)+Var(Bravo)+Var(Charlie)

As per the Statistics, σ can be determined by taking Square Root of Variance.

σ = SQRT(Var)

So, in our case Critical Path σ would be

σ (Critical Path) = SQRT( Var(Alpha)+Var(Bravo)+Var(Charlie) )

Refer again to Figure 2 for all the values. So, in our case, there is a 68.27% likelihood that Project Duration (Critical Path) will come out to be 13±1.37 days. Or, in other words, we can say that there is a 68.27% probability that Project Duration will be between 11.63 days and 14.37 days. Figure 6 shows Critical Path using Mean Duration.

Next step. Let us determine the probability of passing the PMP exam…Good luck to all PMP aspirants!

I hope you would have understood the relationship between CPM and PERT Formulas. You can leave a comment, if you would like to know anything else on this topic.

#### Related Content

I have compiled another article that provides a quick reference to all the three point estimation formulas. It contains 8 different formulas and 6 different sigma values.

I have also compiled a PMP® Formulas Pocket Guide. It is a single page, comprehensive guide having all the important PMP® Exam formulas. You can click here and download it for free. This should help you in your PMP® journey.

If you are looking for a detailed orientation on PMP formulas, then you can buy a package on PMP Exam Formula Study Guide by Cornelius Fichtner. It contains 49 formulas, concepts behind the formulas, 105 sample questions and a 14 day email course.

**Disclosure**: This article contains affiliate links – it means that, if you buy from any of these links, then I will receive a small commission that would help me in maintaining this blog for free. However, for you, there is no extra cost. I recommend only those products that I believe will definitely help the certification aspirants.

Seems like someone here is really inspired from my blog 🙂

Hi, I am not sure why you wrote that but it is a good way to promote your blog

Hi Praveen,

I am lost in the last part of the calculation. Why do we SQRT(sum of variances). We have calculated the STDDev for each activity. So can we not use the sum of these (1.33+0+0.33) to derive Variance.Basically why are we calculating the variance using std deviatn and then going back to finding the std deviatn?

Hi, Your Q is mathematical/statistical in nature. It is beyond the scope of a PM blog. You should read about probability distributions and specifically about beta distribution.

Wow, I never thought this had practical application after reading the PMP books.

It’s actually a cool and helpful piece of information. I

am glad thaqt you just shared this helpful information with us.

Please stay us innformed like this. Thnk you for sharing.

Why is the standard deviation for the whole critical path is 1.37? Can you explain in detail please? Thank you so much

I got it. Sorry for the stupid question lol

What is the use of doing all these calculations? Do PMs do it?

Hi Daniele

If the Senior Management or the Client asks for a schedule deadline, then it helps to have a risk optimized schedule. Rather then giving only the (optimistic) deadline you can give a fair deadline with a probability of achieving the deadline.

All these calculations can be done by using a scheduling s/w.

You can also read another article – //www.pmbypm.com/a-project-is-scheduled-to-fail/

BR

Praveen.

What about monte carlo analysis? Is it same?

No, it is not same. Monte Carlo Analysis accounts for all the paths (including the CPM). It is much more complex. But can say that basic logic for Monte Carlo Algorithm is similar.

Hi i wanted to ask one thing. I have an assignment related to network diagrams. I have calculated the standard deviation and variance for each activity. One part of the question is to Identify the most and least sensitive element. How can i identify these? I am confused about this part. Do i have to look at the sensitivity of element in regard to standard deviation? Is the activity with the highest value of S.D most sensitive element? or Am i going in the wrong direction?

Hi Sara, I think you are on the right direction.

I think, if there is PERT estimation for CP then buffers are not required.

Hi Alan, If the estimations are correct and you have chosen you sigma factor well, buffers are not required.

Thanks. Nice article. Somehow the PMP books do not cover this topic.

Thanks Rameez.

Dear Praveen, Great article thanks a lot. I have a quick question: how did you calculate: there is a 68.27% likelihood that Project Duration (Critical Path) ?

Thanks

Hi Ismael,

Thanks for your kind words.

The 68.27% confidence level comes from statistical theory. You can read any good statistics book for this. You can also look these articles – //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/68%E2%80%9395%E2%80%9399.7_rule & //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_deviation

For short description, you can look at //www.pmbypm.com/pert-and-standard-deviation/

Hope it helps.

Shouldn’t the STDDev for figure 2 be 1.67 instead of 1.37? 1.3333 + 0.3333 = 1.6666 (or 1.67 rounded)

If not, what did i miss?

Hi Bruno

SD cannot be simply added as explained the article. The formula for SD involves taking square root of sum of variances.

σ (Critical Path) = SQRT( Var(Alpha)+Var(Bravo)+Var(Charlie) )

BR